Climate Change Impacts on Cultural and Natural Heritage (CCICH)
General
Name of initiative | Climate Change Impacts on Cultural and Natural Heritage (CCICH) |
---|---|
LPAA initiative | No |
NAZCA Initiative | Yes |
Website address | |
Related initiatives | |
Starting year | 2019 |
End year | |
Secretariat | Coordination Unit as appointed by the Prime Minister of Greece, Mr. Georgios Kremlis
e-mail: fm.coordunit@gsco.gov.gr |
Organisational structure | Greek Government, Greece, UNESCO, UNFCCC, WMO |
Geographical coverage | Global |
Name of lead organisation | Climate Change Impacts on Cultural and Natural Heritage (CCICH) |
Type of lead organisation | United Nations or Specialised agency |
Location/Nationality of lead organisation | Greece |
Description
Description | Greece, with the supporting partnership of UNESCO and the WMO (World Meteorological Organization), launched at the Climate Action Summit 2019 the proposal “Addressing climate change impacts on cultural and natural heritage", inviting the UN member states to support the protection of cultural and natural heritage from the impact of climate change by mainstreaming this protection into climate change policies and/or processes, in line with the related Paris Agreement objectives and commitments and the SDGs, and taking into account policies and recommendations by UNESCO. |
---|---|
Objectives | All countries sign up to:
1) Accelerate practical action and cooperation schemes to adapt cultural and natural heritage to the adverse effects of climate change; 2) Create strategies/ mechanisms to promote research; 3) Foster scientific studies and research methodologies aimed at understanding and demonstrating the effectiveness of knowledge of disaster risk. |
Activities | All countries sign up to:
1) Accelerate practical action and cooperation schemes to adapt cultural and natural heritage to the adverse effects of climate change; 2) Create strategies/ mechanisms to promote research; 3) Foster scientific studies and research methodologies aimed at understanding and demonstrating the effectiveness of knowledge of disaster risk. |
One or two success stories achieved |
Monitoring and Impacts
Function of initiative | |
---|---|
Activity of initiative | |
Indicators | |
Goals | |
Comments on indicators and goals | |
How will goals be achieved | A flexible mechanism that will promote and accelerate the implementation of practical actions and cooperation schemes of the initiative has been created with the participation of representatives from Greece, UNESCO and WMO.
Continuous operation of a Coordination Unit, located in the Academy of Athens, to support, inter alia, the work of the Flexible Mechanism, implement its decisions and promote the proposal’s objectives. Development and maintenance of a database to map and digitize the selected sites and including information regarding the risks, studies and best practices, strategies, measures and actions, as well as identification of gaps in knowledge and policies. Creation of Working Groups on scientific, monitoring, adaptation interventions and dissemination aspects of the CCICH. |
Have you changed or strenghtened your goals | |
Progress towards the goals | |
How are you tracking progress of your initiative | |
Available reporting |
Participants
Participants | Number | Names |
---|---|---|
Members | 93 | |
Companies | 0 | |
Business organisations | 0 | |
Research and educational organisations | 0 | |
Non-governmental organisations | 0 | |
National states | 93 | Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Chile, Cook Island, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Netherlands, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, South Korea, Romania, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United K., USA, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Zimbabwe. |
Governmental actors | 0 | |
Regional / state / county actors | 0 | |
City / municipal actors | 0 | |
Intergovernmental organisations | 0 | |
Financial Institutions | 0 | |
Faith based organisations | 0 | |
Other members | 0 | |
Supporting partners | 0 | |
Number of members in the years | | |
Have only national states as participators | No |
Theme
Transport | Agriculture | Forestry | Business | Financial institutions | Buildings | Industry | Waste | Cities and subnational governments | Short Term Pollutants | International maritime transport | Energy Supply | Fluorinated gases | Energy efficiency | Renewable energy | Supply chain emission reductions | Adaptation | Other | Resilience | Innovation | Energy Access and Efficiency | Private Finance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Not only have national states as participators