Revision as of 14:40, 20 March 2017
General
Name of initiative
|
Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Standard)
|
LPAA initiative
|
No
|
NAZCA Initiative
|
No
|
Website address
|
http://www.climate-standards.org/
|
Related initiatives
|
|
Starting year
|
2003
|
End year
|
|
Secretariat
|
The Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance
|
Organisational structure
|
|
Geographical coverage
|
Global, Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and The Caribbean, Africa, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America
|
Name of lead organisation
|
|
Type of lead organisation
|
Network/Consortium/Partnership
|
Location/Nationality of lead organisation
|
United States of America
|
Description
Description
|
The CCBA is a unique partnership of leading international NGOs that was founded in 2003 with a mission to stimulate and promote land management activities that credibly mitigate global climate change, improve the well-being and reduce the poverty of local communities, and conserve biodiversity. The CCBA brings together diverse stakeholders through a transparent and inclusive participatory process to develop standards that stimulate, identify and promote high quality multiple-benefit land management activities. Last update September 2015.
|
Objectives
|
The Climate, Community and Biodiversity Standards (CCB Standards) evaluate land management projects from the early stages of development through implementation. The CCB Standards foster the integration of best-practice and multiple-benefit approaches into project design and implementation. The CCB Standards: Identify projects that simultaneously address climate change, support local communities and smallholders, and conserve biodiversity; Promote excellence and innovation in project design and implementation; Mitigate risk for investors and offset buyers and increase funding opportunities for project developers
|
Activities
|
|
One or two success stories achieved
|
|
Monitoring and Impacts
Function of initiative
|
Capacity building, Political dialogue
|
Activity of initiative
|
Norms and standard setting, Training and education
|
Indicators
|
|
Goals
|
|
Comments on indicators and goals
|
|
How will goals be achieved
|
|
Have you changed or strenghtened your goals
|
|
Progress towards the goals
|
|
How are you tracking progress of your initiative
|
|
Available reporting
|
|
Participants
Participants
|
Number
|
Names
|
Members
|
0
|
|
Companies
|
0
|
|
Business organisations
|
0
|
|
Research and educational organisations
|
0
|
|
Non-governmental organisations
|
0
|
|
National states
|
0
|
|
Governmental actors
|
0
|
|
Regional / state / county actors
|
0
|
|
City / municipal actors
|
0
|
|
Intergovernmental organisations
|
0
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
0
|
|
Faith based organisations
|
0
|
|
Other members
|
0
|
|
Supporting partners
|
0
|
|
Number of members in the years
|
|
Have only national states as participators
|
|
Theme
Transport
|
Agriculture
|
Forestry
|
Business
|
Financial institutions
|
Buildings
|
Industry
|
Waste
|
Cities and subnational governments
|
Short Term Pollutants
|
International maritime transport
|
Energy Supply
|
Fluorinated gases
|
Energy efficiency
|
Renewable energy
|
Supply chain emission reductions
|
Adaptation
|
Other
|
Resilience
|
Innovation
|
Energy Access and Efficiency
|
Private Finance
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Last update: 10 March 2022 13:40:06
Not only have national states as participators