Difference between revisions of "CEM: Global Lighting Challenge"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Website address=www.globallightingchallenge.org | |Website address=www.globallightingchallenge.org | ||
|Starting year=2015 | |Starting year=2015 | ||
| − | |Secretariat= | + | |Secretariat=Clean Energy Ministerial Secretariat |
| + | 31-35 rue de la Fédération 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France | ||
| + | |||
| + | Email:Secretariat@CEMSecretariat.org | ||
|Organisational structure=Global Lighting Challenge is a CEM Campain | |Organisational structure=Global Lighting Challenge is a CEM Campain | ||
|Geographical coverage=Global | |Geographical coverage=Global | ||
Revision as of 12:52, 10 January 2018
General
| Name of initiative | CEM: Global Lighting Challenge |
|---|---|
| LPAA initiative | Yes |
| NAZCA Initiative | Yes |
| Website address | www.globallightingchallenge.org |
| Related initiatives | |
| Starting year | 2015 |
| End year | |
| Secretariat | Clean Energy Ministerial Secretariat
31-35 rue de la Fédération 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France Email:Secretariat@CEMSecretariat.org |
| Organisational structure | Global Lighting Challenge is a CEM Campain |
| Geographical coverage | Global |
| Name of lead organisation | Clean Energy Ministrial |
| Type of lead organisation | Other intergovernmental organization |
| Location/Nationality of lead organisation | United States of America |
Description
| Description | The Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) is a high-level global forum to promote policies and programs that advance clean energy technology, to share lessons learned and best practices, and to encourage the transition to a global clean energy economy. Initiatives are based on areas of common interest among participating governments and other stakeholders. The CEM is focused on three global climate and energy policy goals:
•Improve energy efficiency worldwide •Enhance clean energy supply •Expand clean energy access |
|---|---|
| Objectives | Overarching goal is to deploy 10 billion high-efficiency bulbs. Other objectives are: Increasing energy savings – implies a focus on efficiency and stringent criteria for defining efficiency and quality, as well as tracking (technical focus);
Accelerating deployment of advanced lighting – implies a focus on number of products and maximizing number of commitments (focus on messaging, outreach, and promotion strategies); Expanding modern lighting access. |
| Activities | |
| One or two success stories achieved | More than eight billion LED lighting products pledged toward the 10 billion goal through a public-private volunteer coalition of more than 40 governments, manufacturers, retailers, and expert groups working together.
http://globallightingchallenge.org/Latest/GLC-CEM7 On 3 May, Minister Ibrahim Baylan launched Belysningsutmaningen, Sweden’s commitment to the Global Lighting Challenge. Together with public and private actors, the Swedish government now races to reduce by half the electricity demand for lighting by 2020 and challenges other countries to follow suit. http://cleanenergyministerial.org/Blog/sweden-challenges-other-countries-to-join-the-global-lighting-challenge-64446 |
Monitoring and Impacts
| Function of initiative | Political dialogue, Implementation |
|---|---|
| Activity of initiative | Policy planning and recommendations, Goal setting (ex-ante) |
| Indicators | |
| Goals | |
| Comments on indicators and goals | |
| How will goals be achieved | |
| Have you changed or strenghtened your goals | |
| Progress towards the goals | Since the launch of the GLC at COP21 we have accumulated commitments totaling over 8 billion lighting products and have tracked the deployment of around 200 million products to date. |
| How are you tracking progress of your initiative | Self-reporting of progress towards commitments once or twice a year. |
| Available reporting | www.globallightingchallenge.org
Updated regularly (about once per month) |
Participants
| Participants | Number | Names | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Members | 0 | |||
| Companies | 0 | |||
| Business organisations | 0 | |||
| Research and educational organisations | 0 | |||
| Non-governmental organisations | 0 | |||
| National states | 0 | |||
| Governmental actors | 0 | |||
| Regional / state / county actors | 0 | |||
| City / municipal actors | 0 | |||
| Intergovernmental organisations | 0 | |||
| Financial Institutions | 0 | |||
| Faith based organisations | 0 | |||
| Other members | 0 | |||
| Supporting partners | 0 | |||
| Number of members in the years |
| |||
| Have only national states as participators | No | |||
Theme
| Transport | Agriculture | Forestry | Business | Financial institutions | Buildings | Industry | Waste | Cities and subnational governments | Short Term Pollutants | International maritime transport | Energy Supply | Fluorinated gases | Energy efficiency | Renewable energy | Supply chain emission reductions | Adaptation | Other | Resilience | Innovation | Energy Access and Efficiency | Private Finance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Not only have national states as participators